A bold decision has been made by the Clark-Shawnee board, one that could drastically impact the future of the district's education and extracurricular offerings. The plan, if certain levies fail to pass, includes staff cuts and the potential elimination of sports and other activities. But here's where it gets controversial: the board is proposing an alternative tax measure to fund these expenses, and it's a move that has sparked debate among the community.
The district is currently facing a financial challenge, with an operating levy for new money last passed in 2014. Mr. Kuhn, a spokesperson for the district, explained that the state's reliance on property taxes and the unpredictable nature of housing values make it an unreliable source of revenue. Instead, they are proposing a 1% earned income tax, which would apply to those earning wages or salaries, including the self-employed. This tax, Kuhn argues, is more stable and fair, as it is based on wage increases rather than property values.
"The 1% earned income tax is designed to shield families on fixed incomes, like those living on retirement or social security benefits," Kuhn said. "It ensures that everyone contributes fairly, and the growth in revenue is tied to wage increases, not property taxes which can be volatile."
However, this proposal has not been met with unanimous support. Voters have already rejected the levy twice, with a significant majority. In November 2025, it was rejected by 73%, and again in May 2025, with 68% voting against it.
If the levy fails in May 2026, the district has outlined a series of cuts and eliminations. Four teaching positions will be cut regardless of the outcome, but if the levy fails, an additional 1.5 teaching positions and 1.5 support staff positions will be reduced. High school and K-8 busing within a two-mile radius of the school will be eliminated, and field trips will be cut, except for student-paid tours like the 8th-grade trip to Washington D.C. Additionally, the curriculum, technology, and building budgets will be reduced by 10%.
And this is the part most people miss: if the levy fails again in November 2026, the district will take even more drastic measures. Athletics will be eliminated, starting with spring 2027 sports, and extracurricular activities will be cut from March 1, 2027. Facilities will also be closed to outside organizations from the same date.
Kuhn emphasized the importance of financial stability for the district, especially with new developments like Bridgewater, Melody Parks, Sycamore Ridge, and Maple Grove, where the district doesn't receive its full share of property tax revenue due to city financing.
"We believe the 1% earned income tax is the prudent choice, providing stability and fairness for all residents," Kuhn said.
The community is now faced with a difficult decision, and the outcome will shape the future of the district. What do you think? Is the proposed tax measure a fair and stable solution, or is it an unfair burden on certain residents? Share your thoughts in the comments and let's discuss this controversial issue further!
